RETIREMENT SAVINGS
Between a financial product and a supplementary
pension, a costly scheme with unclear objectives
Public thematic report
November 2024
2
Executive Summary
Retirement savings, also known as "supplementary pensions" or "funded pensions",
enable you to save during your working life to supplement the sums paid into compulsory
pension schemes. In principle, the savings are frozen until retirement, with the possibility of
early release being limited by the regulations. It was built up in stages with the creation of
various products, initially aimed at specific groups (civil servants, local elected representatives,
the self-employed, the military), then extended to other categories of the population with the
creation of the
Plan d'Epargne Retraite Populaire
(PERP) and collective products offered within
companies.
Supported by a tax incentive scheme, retirement savings have grown significantly in
recent years, with annual contributions of €18.5 billion in 2022, assets of €292.7 billion at the
end of 2023 according to the French Treasury, and more than 16 million contracts. Some of
these assets are held by new entities, the
Fonds de retraite professionnelle supplémentaire
(FRPS), a kind of "French-style pension fund" resulting from the transposition into French law
of the European IORP II Directive
1
on supplementary pension schemes.
Although France has a compulsory pay-as-you-go pension system, retirement savings
account for a modest proportion of total financial savings (4.6 % in 2022), of which it represents
a subset made up partly of life insurance (insurance-based retirement savings) and partly of
shares in collective investment schemes (securities-based retirement savings). Strongly
influenced by the macro-economic determinants of financial savings, retirement savings also
has its own dynamic, noticeable in particular since 2019, the year in which the law of 22 May
2019 on the growth and transformation of businesses (known as the Pacte law) was passed,
reforming its framework and systems.
Four years after the changes introduced by the Pacte Act, and at a time when public
finances are under severe pressure, the Cour des Comptes has deemed it useful to carry out
an assessment of the retirement savings scheme. In particular, it drew on data from the French
Treasury (DGT) and the Directorate for Research, Studies, Evaluation and Statistics (Drees).
1
European Directive IORP II (Institutions of Occupational Retirement Provisions) of 14 December 2016 on the
activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs). It aims to limit the activity of
IORPs to retirement benefits and related activities so that, in the event of bankruptcy of the sponsoring company,
the assets of the IORP are safeguarded in the interests of members and beneficiaries.
3
The transition before/after the Pacte Act
Source: French Treasury, 2021
In this report, it provides previously unpublished data and information, obtained in
particular through the use of tax databases. In particular, it should be noted that the tax and
social security deductions available for retirement savings represent a significant cost to the
public purse, which this evaluation estimates at €1.8 billion in 2022, without taking into account
compulsory group retirement savings
2
.
Has the Pacte Act encouraged the development of retirement savings, and
at what cost to public finances?
The weight of funded pensions in the French pension system remains modest: in
2022, pension savings accounted for just 5.1 % of pension contributions and 2.3 % of benefits.
Around 13 % of working people have a company pension savings plan (PER) and 10 % have
an individual product, although it is possible to have both, and just over one in two people had
contributed in 2022. This system, which makes it possible to significantly supplement pensions
from compulsory pension schemes, is therefore far from widespread.
2
These are retirement savings plans offered by certain companies, which employees are obliged to join if they
are in the category covered by the scheme.
4
Share of supplementary pensions
Source: DREES, 2024
After running out of steam in the 2010s, retirement savings schemes have received a
fresh boost since 2019, which can be credited to the simplification and clarification that the
Pacte Act introduced into the available products and their operating rules. It replaced the old
contracts, whose names and rules varied depending on the target audience, with a single
product, the pension savings plan (PER). Available to individuals (PERIN) or to groups of
employees on a compulsory (PEROB) or optional (PERCOL) basis, the PER has encouraged
the development of retirement savings, particularly for individuals, marked by an increase in
the number of members and contributors
3
and an increase in funds under management.
3
A member may hold a policy but not make any contributions.
5
Change in retirement savings assets under management by old and new products and
amount transferred
Source: French Treasury
The Pacte Act has also helped to standardise the rules governing contracts. The tax and
social security rules, which allow savings to be deducted from taxable income up to a certain
limit, have been harmonised. Savers are also better protected thanks to the default "guided
management" rule, which means that investments become less and less risky as the
policyholder approaches retirement age.
The option of withdrawing capital rather than an annuity has been expanded, and the
possibilities for early withdrawal have been extended. The aim of these provisions is to make
this investment more attractive to households, but they also raise the question of the purposes
assigned to retirement savings schemes by the Pacte Act. The latter has had the effect of
making supplementary pensions closer to other savings products, in particular life insurance,
by increasing possibilities for lump-sum withdrawals. However, this approach, which focuses
more on savings than on retirement, is consistent with the aims of the Pacte Act, which are to
encourage households to build up long-term savings in order to boost long-term investment in
the productive economy.
Although supplementary pension contributions can be deducted from taxable income,
since 2011 they have no longer been considered as tax expenditure, since the benefits, paid
out in the form of an annuity or capital sum, are taxed when they are withdrawn from the
scheme. However, this evaluation estimates the annual cost of this tax system at a minimum
of €1.8 billion each year, including the exemption from social security contributions for
employee savings, but without taking into account the costs associated with compulsory
company pension contracts, which cannot be quantified. It should also be noted that there is a
discrepancy between the number of members and contributors to retirement savings contracts
and the number of taxpayers actually benefiting from tax deductions in this respect, which is
lower.
The French funded retirement savings system is therefore conceived and understood by
both the authorities and its beneficiaries as a financial tool rather than a complement to
compulsory retirement schemes, and its place in relation to the latter has never been the
subject of in-depth consideration. It also represents a high cost for the State, given the
associated tax benefits.
6
Has the Pacte Act encouraged a wider access to retirement savings
among the French population?
Data on the distribution of retirement savings in the population is either sparse or
non- existent. Government departments only monitor these schemes and their beneficiaries to
a very limited extent. The Directorate General of the Treasury, which initiated and oversees
the application of the Pacte Act, reports only on changes in assets under management and the
number of subscribers to the new products.
France Stratégie
, which is responsible for
monitoring the Pacte Act, produces a brief annual report on the effects of the new legislative
provisions. The Directorate for Research, Studies, Evaluation and Statistics (Drees) publishes
an in-depth annual study on the behaviour of savers and beneficiaries but does not have the
data to study their profile in terms of income or assets. Insee publishes data on household
wealth, distinguishing retirement savings from life insurance and other financial savings
vehicles, but on the basis of old data and with no indication of the amounts contributed, making
it impossible to distinguish between old and new products resulting from the Pacte Act.
Based on these publications and tax data, which do not cover all beneficiaries, it is
nevertheless possible to characterise the distribution of retirement savings in the population.
The breakdown of the 5.536 million members of individual retirement savings schemes and
the 10.5 million members of company group contracts shows that these schemes tend to be
reserved for wealthier socio-professional categories, older savers and taxpayers with high
rates of tax. The new products also seem to reinforce these characteristics: their holders are
subject to higher tax rates than holders of the old products. As far as collective products are
concerned, the type of company in which the saver works remains a determining factor, as the
possibility of access to a collective PER (PERCOL) increases with the size of the company.
Age breakdown of members by product
Source: DREES, 2024
7
Breakdown of marginal tax rates among taxpayers and savers filing tax returns
Source: Court of Accounts based on POTE 2022 files
While half of all applications for annual tax allowances are for less than €1,700 for
individual PERs (PERINs), some are for much higher amounts. The option of carrying forward
the unused portion of the deduction limit to the following three years and benefiting from the
spouse's limit opens up a wide range of possibilities for taxpayers seeking to optimise their tax
situation. It would be advisable to tighten up this system to avoid certain excesses which divert
the schemes from their function of retirement preparation.
At the same time, there is still room for improvement in terms of the transparency of
retirement savings management fees, in the hope that these will become less costly for savers.
This is particularly important for individual savers who are not in a position to negotiate the
rates imposed, and part of their tax advantage is ultimately captured by the accumulated
charges levied on their investment.
Examination of the distribution of products among the population therefore confirms that
retirement savings, while making it possible to supplement the retirement of those who benefit
from low replacement rates, is first and foremost an investment and savings instrument, whose
advantageous tax treatment enables wealthy and relatively elderly savers to benefit from tax
advantages.
Does the development of retirement savings encourage the financing of
productive investment?
Retirement savings investments are difficult to distinguish from employee savings and
life insurance. It is therefore not easy to measure the progress made since the statement in
the explanatory memorandum to the Pacte Act that the majority of retirement savings are
invested in assets that are ill-suited to long-term investment, whether sovereign debt or
corporate debt.
However, the Court's analysis by product, based on data provided by
France Assureurs
,
shows a higher exposure to risk for retirement savings in the process of being built up, as well
as for PERs. The most significant equity investments are made in the individual PER (with an
equity component of around 30 %) and the mandatory company PER, as well as in the
mandatory retirement contract for executives and managers (Article 39 of the French general
tax code). The proportion of portfolios made up of interest-rate products ranges from
51 % (individual PER) to 64 % (compulsory pension contracts under Article 83 of the French
general tax code and former individual products).
8
Comparison of life insurance and insurance-based retirement savings investments at
the end of 2022
Source: France Assureurs. Court of Accounts Extrapolation
The equity weighting of investments made in the employee savings funds to which the
collective company savings plans contribute is 24 % (32 % taking into account the equity
portion of diversified investments), without it being possible to distinguish between what
corresponds to company savings plans (PEE) or collective retirement savings plans.
Breakdown of diversified employee savings funds by asset class
Source: AFG
A few years after the adoption of the Pacte Act, one of the aims of which was to
encourage investment in the productive economy, the investments made in insurance-based
retirement savings are still predominantly in euro funds and, in the case of securities account
retirement savings, are heavily weighted in fixed-income products. The propensity to take risk
in equities could be accentuated by a stronger invitation to invest in SMEs/ETIs, as the Green
Industry Act of October 2023 encourages.
9
Guidelines
The low impact on companies' equity investments and the inequitable distribution of
retirement savings among the population justify, in a highly constrained budgetary context, a
tightening of the tax advantage attached to this product.
These observations lead the Court to formulate four guidelines:
- clarify the objectives assigned to these long-term savings schemes in relation to the
development of compulsory pay-as-you-go pensions;
- provide tools for monitoring these schemes (analysing their cost, reconciling tax data,
statistical data from DREES and data from retirement savings scheme managers);
- tighten up the tax benefits attached to retirement savings, in particular by reviewing the
possibility of carrying forward deduction ceilings from one year to the next and the amount of
the annual deduction ceilings;
- following on from the Green Industry Act of 23 October 2023, encourage the channelling
of pension savings funds towards financing SMEs.